WHAT IS A LAND PATENT?

WHAT IS A LAND PATENT??

Essentially, a Land Patent is the first conveyance of title ownership to land which the U.S. Government grants a citizen who applies for one. One of the earliest laws for granting Land Patents was passed by Congress on April 24, 1820. Among other things, Congress set up Government Land officers, now known as the Bureau of Land Management. Land was usually sold in parcels of 160 acres for $1.25 per acre. The law in 1820 prohibited the borrowing or use of "credit" for the purchase of government land. In the debates in Congress prior to passage of this act, Senator King of New York said in March 1820 ... "it was calculated to plant in the new country a population of independent unembarrassed freeholder ... that it would place , in every man, the Power to Purchase a freehold. the price of which could be cleared in 3 years... that it would cut up speculation and monopoly ... that it would prevent the accumulation of alarming debt which experience proved never would and never could be paid" !!! (emphasis added) Later on, in 1862, a Homestead Act stated in Section 4: "That no lands acquired under the provisions of this act shall in any event become liable to the satisfaction of any debt or debts contracted prior to the issuing of the patent therefor".

It can be clearly seen that the intent of these early lawmakers was for the people of this country to be FREEMEN AND FREEHOLDERS of their land, and not ever be subject to have it taken from them by any government, feudal authority or banker or any other party who might have a claim against the person who owned the land. In plain English, a Land Patent which gave you an allodial freehold, that was "judgement proof and yes- even immune from tax liens. In [60] effect, the only authority over you or your land was GOD himself. In England, a man, who owned free from authority of the king, was known as a freeholder and his land as a freehold or allodial freehold. Most land patents in the U.S. were issued prior to 1900. However, even today, new land patents continue to be issued, mostly for gas, oil and mineral rights on public lands. For this reason, there are several land offices that remain open in the United States.



WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A LAND PATENT?



On the basis of all the case law I have seen, there is no doubt in my mind that a land patent issued by the Bureau of Land Management which gives you a title at law is far superior to any title acquired in equity. such as a sheriff's deed. The land patent will, therefore, prevent your ejectment and removal from the land or the property you occupy on the land. The debts or claims of other parties will remain, but the land will be removed from assets which they can attach. The law is on the books today which says that any debts, which lie against the land, that existed prior to the land patent being issued, are removed from the land. The next question is; if the land patents were issued 100 or more years ago to persons who are no longer alive, and if I now reside on only a portion of the land that was originally described in the original land patent, then how do I bring up the land patent in my name'? And if I bring it up in my name, will it remove the land as security which the Bank or Mortgage Company can sell and seize in a foreclosure action? [61]



DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT



The procedures which I will describe are not time tested, as they have not worked their way through the U.S. Supreme Court. This does not mean that these procedures will not ultimately be successful. Any basis for a legal approach must be supported by a legal theory. We already know and can substantiate that an original land patent will protect your land from any equitable or collateral attack. However, we do not know for certain that the existing procedures will vest in us the same rights and immunities by filing a DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT, and updating it in your name. However, since there is little to lose and possibly much to gain, it would be wise to file a DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT, in the future event that it is sustained.

The theory is based on two premises. First, in the original land patent, that was granted, lets say 100 years ago the land patent document itself says that this patent is granted to the original party AS WELL AS TO THEIR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS. While most of us are not heirs, ARE NOT WE ALL ASSIGNS? Since land patents were originally issued, nearly all conveyances of title were done by the use of deeds, like Quit Claim Deeds and Warranty Deeds. However, the money lenders found a way around land patents by creating, new paper instruments like deeds of trust and mortgages, all of which convey equitable interests. However, the land patent its remains the highest title at law, and few persons have updated a land patent in their name. Where a land patent exists, no lien or mortgage could be ever placed on the land. Since the intent of the lawmakers is the law, historic evidence shows that our founding fathers wanted us to own the land [62] in its entirety, and subject to the claims of no other man or government or other institution. Because the laws were passed by Congress setting up Land Offices to grant land patents, the best jurisdiction in which to raise these issues are the Federal Courts.

In the Declaration of Land Patent, we then declare that we are the ASSIGNEE'S of the original land patent, even though we may be 2nd,..3rd, 4th, etc., after the party to whom the original patent was issued. TO LET YOU KNOW HOW SERIOUS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS TAKING THESE DECLARATIONS OF LAND PATENTS, Don Walker has recently stated: "That in Illinois, he personally knows of a farmer who applied for a $500,000 loan and was told by the Federal Land Bank that it would be granted if he removed his Declaration of Land Patent. Also, the FLB is now itself applying for and filing Declarations of Land Patents on farms it is "foreclosing on". We have also learned that oil, gas and coal companies are filing these declarations on land already titled in their name through deeds. Also, Dennis Schlueter of Fort Collins, Colorado has stated: he knows of banks who are foreclosing on mortgages, that are then filing these DECLARATIONS OF LAND PATENTS on the property that they just foreclosed on. Now if these land patents were worthless pieces of paper, then why is everybody jumping on the bandwagon?

After the review of several different land patents, the one enclosed in this paper is, considered the one that best sums up what is to be said. [63]

The one major pitfall, that must be avoided, is that when filing the declaration of land patents, do not place the same legal description in the declarations that was in the original land patent issued by the Bureau of Land Management. What this does is cloud the title to the property of other persons who are living in properties that are part of the legal description of the original land patent. As a result, several lawsuits were filed to quiet title. To prevent this from happening, you must write in your Declaration of Land Patent only the legal description of the property to which you are an assignee. In other words, the legal description from your deed or abstract is what you must use. For this reason, the enclosed Declaration of Land Patent has in it, adequate language for this purpose. A Declaration of Homestead should be attached to your Declaration of Land Patent, but the legal description in your Declaration of Homestead must be 160 acres or less to comply with Federal Law on filing Homesteads. Along with the declaration of Land Patent and the Declaration of Homestead is a certified copy of the original land patent which you can obtain from your nearest land office. These papers are all stapled together and filed in either your County Recorder's office or with the Register of Deeds.

DO NOT SEND CHECKS. SEND MONEY ORDERS ONLY / MAKE PAYABLE TO: Bureau of Land Management

After you receive your copy of the original Land Patent or Land Grant, then staple it to a Declaration of Land Patent and file it in your County Recorder's office or Register of Deeds. You now have your allodial title. If you haven't filed a Declaration of Homestead, then you should do so and attach it to your Land Patent. You may file a Declaration of Homestead on up to 160 [64] acres, but not more. A Declaration of Homestead can only be filed on property that you actually live on. A Land Patent can only be filed on property that has been assigned to you. You don't file one on your neighbor's property or they can sue you for slandering his title.

A Declaration of Homestead should be filed whether or not you file a Land Patent. It may be filed with, before, or after your lawsuit is filed. Both Land Patents and Declarations of Homestead must be Notarized. A sample of both are enclosed. Make photocopies of both before using them or you may retype your own.

After your Land Patent is filed, you must send a photocopy by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to your bank or mortgage company, FLB, FMRA, PCA, etc and to any and all parties that may have an equitable interest in your property so they have been placed on NOTICE that you are updating the Land Patent in your name and they will have 60 days to challenge your claim to your allodial title in a court of law or forever keep their silence. Be sure to keep your green tickets when they come back.



GIVING NOTICE IS A BASIC PRINCIPLE OF LAW. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT

LAND OFFICES ORIGINALLY ISSUED THE LAND PATENTS, THEY PUBLISHED

THE LAND PATENT WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 60 DAYS: WHEN NOT

CHALLENGED BY ANYONE, THE LAND PATENT WAS THEN GRANTED. AN

ALTERNATIVE WAY TO GIVE THE OTHER PARTY NOTICE IS TO PUBLISH A

"NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT" in a legal publication in your county

of residence.



Include the legal description on your property in the ad with this warning: "If any party having a claim, lien or debt or other equitable interest fails to file a suit in a court of law within 60 days [65] from the date of filing or on (insert date), then they shall waive all future claims against this land and it will become the property and allodial freehold of the Assignee to said Patent. (your name - Assignee)

Wish To Be A Sovereign Freeman? Here You Go, Send This To Your Government.

Whereas I understand The Children and Family and Community Services Act defines a child as a ‘person’ and not a ‘human being’, and,

Whereas I understand we create a ‘person’ and associate that ‘person’ with our offspring when we register our offspring, and,

Whereas I understand Black’s Law dictionary states, “a human being is not a person because they are a human being, but rather because rights and duties have been ascribed to them. Specifically the person is the legal subject or substance of which rights and duties are attributes”, and,

Whereas I understand as parents we can distinguish our offspring from it’s ‘person’, and disassociate our offspring from it’s ‘person’, and,

Whereas I understand the law allows me to use potentially lethal force to protect my offspring from abduction, even from an Agent of the State who is acting under the colour of law, and,

Whereas you understand I will disassociate my offspring from it’s ‘person’ and use potentially lethal force to protect them if any government agents apprehend them for any reason,

Be it known to any and all parties that I, [Your Name] do hereby clearly, unequivocally and specifically state my intent to disassociate my future offspring from its ‘person’ and use potentially lethal force to protect them if any agent for any government ministry attempts to remove, seize or apprehend them for any reason.

Whereas it is my understanding that all Acts are statutes, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act is a statute, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the only form of government recognized as lawful in this Common Law jurisdiction is a representative type, and,


Whereas it is my understanding that representation requires mutual consent, and,


Whereas it is my understanding that if I do not consent to representation, then I do not have a government and I am not a member of the society governed by the Acts and subsisting regulations, orders and bylaws, and,


Whereas I do not consent to representation, and,

Whereas I understand statutes do not have the force of law over those who have not consented to be governed, and,

Whereas I understand that a principal has a duty to ensure that the people acting as their agents understand the source, nature and limits of the authority in their mandates, and,

Whereas I understand I give up certain benefits and legal rights by existing outside of society, and,

Whereas I understand I recapture all Common Law rights by existing outside of society,

Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction, and,

Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,

Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SIN, and,

Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,

Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,

Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,

Whereas I, [Your Name] am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,

Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,

Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,

Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that Sky Train is in fact an actuality public property to which I have the right of use and access, and,

Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the British Columbia Securities Commission create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,

Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,

Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,

Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,

Whereas having read Transit Conduct and Safety Regulations it is my understanding that the term “tariff” means the applicable fare structure
(a) set out in an annual operating agreement,
(b) established by a regional transit commission, or
(c) in the case of a commuter rail service, prescribed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council or set out in the operating agreement pertaining to the commuter rail service; and,

Whereas I have not agreed to an annual operating agreement, submitted to a regional transit commission nor consented to the Lieutenant Governor in Council prescribing on my behalf and therefore am not required by them or the tariff to pay a fare, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the aforementioned tariff does not apply to me, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that Sky Train is PublicTransit and that I am a member of the Public, thus free to use Public Transit as it is my property. and,

Whereas I have found nothing in the aforementioned regulations empowering Sky Train Security to remove anyone for failure to present a proof of fare, and,

Whereas a valid Proof of Fare could be notice of my lawfully claimed status, and,

Whereas I am against TransLink Security removing people for failure to present proof of fare as it could endanger life, and,

Whereas not having Proof of Fare does not affect the safety, good order or convenience of other persons, and, BE it known to any and all, that I, [Your Name] do intend to exercise my right to ride SkyTrain without paying a fare.

Whereas there is an unidentified number on the back of my Birth Certificate, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that said number is a bond tracking number, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the bond evidenced by that number generates revenue every year, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the revenue generated forms part of the Federal Transfer payments sent to the provincial governments every year, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that the Minister of Finance ___ or the Receiver General ____ is standing as a Fiduciary Agent in Trust for me over my Bond and the revenue generated by it, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have the right to terminate the duties of my Fiduciary Agent if doing so is in my best interest, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that if and when I do terminate the duties of my Fiduciary agent any commercial instruments, documents or other paper which they presently hold in Trust for me, immediately reverts to my ownership, and,

Whereas I do hereby claim the Bond numbered ___ held in Trust by the Minister of Finance___ or the Receiver General ___, as the case may be, is mine, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have the right to a full accounting of that bond and account,

Therefore, be it known to any and all, that I do hereby;

a)Terminate the fiduciary responsibilities of the Federal Minister of Finance or the Receiver General as the case may be over my Bond, number # ____, and,
b)Demand under Section 337 of the Criminal Code of Canada that the bond document #__ be immediately turned over to me via secured registered mail in care of the address below, and,
c)Demand a full accounting by my ex-fiduciary of all monies ever collected or paid into or out of this account, who they were collected from and paid to, and under whose authority those transaction occurred, and,

Whereas I understand any dishonour will result in an immediate summary judgment ordering the release of my Bond to me and the seizure for abandonment of the performance Bond of the Fiduciary, and Failure to do as ordered may also result in criminal charges for nonfeasance, malfeasance, breach of Trust, and for a contravention against section 337 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and

Where as it is my intent to download and upload digital media freely, and without limitation.

Whereas it is my intent to exercise my right to use marijuana for medical reasons, and,

Whereas it is my intent to exercise my right to grow marijuana for my personal use, and,

Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, use, carry and otherwise enjoy marijuana and,

Whereas I understand that with the Notice I do hereby establish that legal right, and

Whereas I understand that by serving this instrument upon The Attourney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and,

Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attourney General, and,

Whereas the word ‘confiscate’ legally means ‘to remove without legal right’ and,

Whereas I understand Peace Officers who ‘confiscate’ my property are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the colour of law, and

Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and,

Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, [Your Name] a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada.

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.

Furthermore, I claim that the courts in British Columbia are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

Furthermore, I claim the right to an education.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use the funds either in my bond (evidenced by the bond tracking number on the Birth Certificate issued to me by the government) or to use the funds generated by the bond to either pay off any student loan if I do have one, or to pay directly for my education if I do not have a loan.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use the funds in the bond or revenue generated by those funds to pay for food and shelter and any other rights recognized by the United Nations.

Furthermore, I claim the right to fire any one acting as a fiduciary over my bond if they fail to acknowledge all rights herein claimed.

Furthermore, I claim the right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and in doing so free myself from all statutory obligations and restrictions, if doing so is, in my opinion, in my best interest.

Furthermore, I claim the right to direct my fiduciary as to what to do with the revenue generated by my bond, provided the directives are a benefit to my society and me.

Furthermore, I claim the right to order and direct my federal representatives to transfer directly to me funds and moneys which they would normally transfer to my provincial representatives in the absence of any directives, if doing so is, in my opinion, in my best interest.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land

[signed, Your Name]


Place of claim of right: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Dated: ______
Claimant: ______
Notary Public: ____
Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.