William Cooper proposes that the illuminati string-pullers have analyzed economics by applying the same principles used to understand physical phenomena like mechanics and electromagnetics. Energy can be kinetic or potential in form. In mechanics, potential energy is stored with spring/elasticity. Kinetic energy is stored with inertia.When electricity flows potential energy is stored in a capacitor (capacitance) and kinetic energy is stored in an inductor (inductance).
Energy dissipation happens via friction (mechanical) and resistance (electrical). When energy flows there typically exists some degree of resistance. Electrical energy dissipation is performed by a resistor, and conductors themselves (e.g. a wire) will have some property of resistance unless we're dealing with a superconductor in its prime environment.
All of the mathematical theory developed in the study of one energy system can be applied in the study of any other energy system. Here the same understanding of energy dynamics is applied to economics.
Economic Capacitance = Capital (money, stock/inventory, assets)
Economic Conductance = Goods (production flow coefficient)
Economic Inductance = Services (the influence of the population of industry on output)
Elite bankers realized that currency or deposit loan accounts had the appearance of power that could be used to induce people (economic inductance) into spending their real wealth (capital) and converting/exchanging it for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation). People are willing to put up real collateral in exchange for promissory notes.
The elite bankers also realized they could issue more notes than they truly had backing for, so long as they simply had “enough” of the existing customer’s gold stock on hand as a persuader to convince new customers. This is known as fractional reserve banking. An excess of promissory notes in turn creates overconfidence (stored charge for a period of low energy) in an economy - then money can be made scarce to tighten control of the system and collect collateral through obligation of contracts. This cycle continues to be repeated again and again.
These pressures are also used to incite war, as the elite bankers can control the availability of currency, as well as control the progression and ending of a war. Any governments who agree to give the elite bankers control of their economic system would then gain the banker's support. Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic aid to the enemy of the debtor. We often talk about ending war from the ethical standpoint forgetting that the economic system is an even more critical reason as to why war is inescapably repeatable. All of this can often be achieved without the use of war and employing economic hitmen (private persuaders).
These resulting economic systems use the same system described above to convert/exchange economic capacitance for economic inductance. Governments would then order currency to be printed beyond the limits of their precious metal and GNP backing. Low and behold inflation and the seizure of a nation’s true resources. In this system credit is presented as a pure element called "currency" with the appearance of capital, but is, in fact, negative capital. So what is in fact debt or indebtedness, becomes presented as a service.
This excess of debt in existence without enough actual currency in existence to repay itself (debt + interest/additional debt) plays itself like a game of musical chairs that typically must be balanced by the negation of the population, also known as war and genocide. The total goods & services represent real capital. Promissory notes of credit may be printed up to this amount and still represent economic capacitance, but when printed beyond this level it is then subtractive and represents the introduction of economic inductance. Notes of indebtedness.
War is the balancing system that balances by killing the true creditors, who are the public who have been induced to convert their true value in exchange for inflated currency. The elite bankers used the power of their currency to manipulate the economic structure to their own advantage. A system that shifts economic inductance to those economic positions which would encourage the greatest economic instability/oscillation. When the flow of economic value (e.g. money) diminishes, the human population field collapses in order to keep the economic value flowing (open-ended social welfare programs, slavery, genocide, war) further asking the elite bankers for more “help” or an economic-drug dependency. If people really cared about their fellow man they would control their expensive appetites for greed, procreation, etcetera, but when advertisements market excessive consumption, the importance of materialism for social status, and there is an accompanying overconfidence (inductance) in the sustainability of such desires (when in reality there really isn’t) finding an end to war becomes not a matter of empathy, ethics & morality between nations but instead one of sustainability.
The next key to economic control piggybacks off of what we now know as data-mining. Predicting the outcome of electromagnetic and mechanical events is relatively easy to do as it does not depend on the human variable(s). Predicting the trends and trajectory of economic events requires a knowledge of how the general public acts. Keeping close watch on the economic oscillations created by the collective public’s social/economic habits is essential. It is believed that with a sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be just as easy to predict and control the economic trajectory as that of a projectile flying through space.
This data-mining began with Universal Product Code (UPC) , the IRS, and the use of consumer-identifying credit cards. From this it continues to progress in several different sectors. Do you ever wonder why free services like Google and Facebook can become the richest corporations - richer than nations - all while their services remain essentially free. It’s not just public advertising campaigns that substantiate their wealth. These big data corporations have been bought out by the elite to gain social and economic intel in the pursuit of unsurmountable knowledge and power. Political elections can also be used to gain intel by assessing the balance of the population's general views & values - particularly holding elections during the time of shock-test (war, pandemic, financial collapse, all of the above, anything which instills a mass fear reaction) .
Once data is funneled in from all these aspects of life and collected, not only can trends and personal preferences be measured but more importantly they can be tested and used to fine-tune the machine. When the price of commodities are shocked, the public reaction of the consumer can be monitored. These resulting echoes from the economic shock are gathered via data-mining (something that we now give for free and preach on the social media soapbox with full compliance) and then interpreted by theoretical algorithms that project trends giving economic scientists a detailed understanding of reality. Having access to data in all aspects of human activity worldwide and analyzing the interrelationships of investment, production, distribution, consumptions, it all functions much like the web of a spider. The vibrations, echos, and secondary resonations can be felt and mapped out instantly by computers. This same technique is used in the aviation field to measure how the recoil of an impulse is distributed through an airframe to discover structural weak spots.
The economy is understood and controlled with market shock-tests and then can be corrected and directed as is deemed fit using the controlled media outlets, journalism industry, and entertainment industry. These serve to both dampen (divert attention from real important matters, dumb down content) and amplify (increase attention in other areas) the socioeconomic input-output circuitry . This is what the amplification of the movement we now know as the left, liberal, social justice movement is currently designed and engineered to achieve. Polarization and identity politics or value-clumping, catchy pop-culture rhetoric & trends can all brainwash people to act more predictably and for those outliers who choose to stand out, there is a strong policing from the general public to conform and not be considered odd, crazy, unpopular, unsuccessful, etc.
It functions just as advertisements do to coerce consumers to purchase. Using persuasive, and at times deceitful, language is an ancient technique in sorcery, often first attributed to the Phoenicians, using wording and word-play, and other techniques to re-shape the subject’s semantical framework and their coherently knit value system. The majority of this plays out in the old reptilian brain and ends up achieving an influenceable impulsive action that feels as though it came solely from the subject themself. It’s pretty difficult to notice the degrees in which these programs play out in our own realities as they are hidden in unconscious veil and surface by our own freewill. Returning to the electrical analogy, these amplifiers use game theory systems to deliver power gain and other changes to the economic circuitry.
The next step in data-mining to further streamline and enhance the funneling continues to evolve and innovate. In China social media apps have begun to dig deeper into user’s activity, gathering all aspects of lifestyle in an all-in-one application. Wechat is a social media network that has integrated medical services & health information, online banking and almost every other public and private service. The Chinese people no longer carry cash or even credit cards around as its much less of a hassle to simply scan a barcode with their phone and pay through the app. These things are all a decade or more implemented and now the emergence of 5G technology paired with facial recognition software will be streamlining things further.
Currently intel can only be gathered when one has a mobile phone - many apps gather the information that we post, but just as much and perhaps more of the data that is gathered by giving apps permission to tap (keypad, microphone, photos, videos, etc.). You don’t even have to post it. But still one must have a mobile phone and grant these permissions. The future model plans to use 5Gs potential to bypass the need for consumer/citizen mobile phone input altogether and instead use a surveilled camera master-grid to identify citizens, read lips, and perhaps eventually use “human augmentation” and install permanent biohardwares (surgical implants and innovative prosthetics), so that when you need an uber you don’t even need to operate a phone that’s installed an app, you’d simply just say the words.
All this implemented in a strategic way of introducing a problem that creates a reaction for a solution that includes further stripping the people's rights and delivering a greater degree of control to the controller. These systems whether environmental, educational, healthcare, terrorism, war, are a complex of compartmentalized blocks where the foundational blocks are only given the limited amount of information that is required for them to do their job and that which overrides their scope is either withheld or provided as executive order. This is how control happens and how a few can control the many.
Thursday, April 9, 2020
Monday, January 2, 2012
WHAT IS A LAND PATENT?
WHAT IS A LAND PATENT??
Essentially, a Land Patent is the first conveyance of title ownership to land which the U.S. Government grants a citizen who applies for one. One of the earliest laws for granting Land Patents was passed by Congress on April 24, 1820. Among other things, Congress set up Government Land officers, now known as the Bureau of Land Management. Land was usually sold in parcels of 160 acres for $1.25 per acre. The law in 1820 prohibited the borrowing or use of "credit" for the purchase of government land. In the debates in Congress prior to passage of this act, Senator King of New York said in March 1820 ... "it was calculated to plant in the new country a population of independent unembarrassed freeholder ... that it would place , in every man, the Power to Purchase a freehold. the price of which could be cleared in 3 years... that it would cut up speculation and monopoly ... that it would prevent the accumulation of alarming debt which experience proved never would and never could be paid" !!! (emphasis added) Later on, in 1862, a Homestead Act stated in Section 4: "That no lands acquired under the provisions of this act shall in any event become liable to the satisfaction of any debt or debts contracted prior to the issuing of the patent therefor".
It can be clearly seen that the intent of these early lawmakers was for the people of this country to be FREEMEN AND FREEHOLDERS of their land, and not ever be subject to have it taken from them by any government, feudal authority or banker or any other party who might have a claim against the person who owned the land. In plain English, a Land Patent which gave you an allodial freehold, that was "judgement proof and yes- even immune from tax liens. In [60] effect, the only authority over you or your land was GOD himself. In England, a man, who owned free from authority of the king, was known as a freeholder and his land as a freehold or allodial freehold. Most land patents in the U.S. were issued prior to 1900. However, even today, new land patents continue to be issued, mostly for gas, oil and mineral rights on public lands. For this reason, there are several land offices that remain open in the United States.
WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A LAND PATENT?
On the basis of all the case law I have seen, there is no doubt in my mind that a land patent issued by the Bureau of Land Management which gives you a title at law is far superior to any title acquired in equity. such as a sheriff's deed. The land patent will, therefore, prevent your ejectment and removal from the land or the property you occupy on the land. The debts or claims of other parties will remain, but the land will be removed from assets which they can attach. The law is on the books today which says that any debts, which lie against the land, that existed prior to the land patent being issued, are removed from the land. The next question is; if the land patents were issued 100 or more years ago to persons who are no longer alive, and if I now reside on only a portion of the land that was originally described in the original land patent, then how do I bring up the land patent in my name'? And if I bring it up in my name, will it remove the land as security which the Bank or Mortgage Company can sell and seize in a foreclosure action? [61]
DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT
The procedures which I will describe are not time tested, as they have not worked their way through the U.S. Supreme Court. This does not mean that these procedures will not ultimately be successful. Any basis for a legal approach must be supported by a legal theory. We already know and can substantiate that an original land patent will protect your land from any equitable or collateral attack. However, we do not know for certain that the existing procedures will vest in us the same rights and immunities by filing a DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT, and updating it in your name. However, since there is little to lose and possibly much to gain, it would be wise to file a DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT, in the future event that it is sustained.
The theory is based on two premises. First, in the original land patent, that was granted, lets say 100 years ago the land patent document itself says that this patent is granted to the original party AS WELL AS TO THEIR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS. While most of us are not heirs, ARE NOT WE ALL ASSIGNS? Since land patents were originally issued, nearly all conveyances of title were done by the use of deeds, like Quit Claim Deeds and Warranty Deeds. However, the money lenders found a way around land patents by creating, new paper instruments like deeds of trust and mortgages, all of which convey equitable interests. However, the land patent its remains the highest title at law, and few persons have updated a land patent in their name. Where a land patent exists, no lien or mortgage could be ever placed on the land. Since the intent of the lawmakers is the law, historic evidence shows that our founding fathers wanted us to own the land [62] in its entirety, and subject to the claims of no other man or government or other institution. Because the laws were passed by Congress setting up Land Offices to grant land patents, the best jurisdiction in which to raise these issues are the Federal Courts.
In the Declaration of Land Patent, we then declare that we are the ASSIGNEE'S of the original land patent, even though we may be 2nd,..3rd, 4th, etc., after the party to whom the original patent was issued. TO LET YOU KNOW HOW SERIOUS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS TAKING THESE DECLARATIONS OF LAND PATENTS, Don Walker has recently stated: "That in Illinois, he personally knows of a farmer who applied for a $500,000 loan and was told by the Federal Land Bank that it would be granted if he removed his Declaration of Land Patent. Also, the FLB is now itself applying for and filing Declarations of Land Patents on farms it is "foreclosing on". We have also learned that oil, gas and coal companies are filing these declarations on land already titled in their name through deeds. Also, Dennis Schlueter of Fort Collins, Colorado has stated: he knows of banks who are foreclosing on mortgages, that are then filing these DECLARATIONS OF LAND PATENTS on the property that they just foreclosed on. Now if these land patents were worthless pieces of paper, then why is everybody jumping on the bandwagon?
After the review of several different land patents, the one enclosed in this paper is, considered the one that best sums up what is to be said. [63]
The one major pitfall, that must be avoided, is that when filing the declaration of land patents, do not place the same legal description in the declarations that was in the original land patent issued by the Bureau of Land Management. What this does is cloud the title to the property of other persons who are living in properties that are part of the legal description of the original land patent. As a result, several lawsuits were filed to quiet title. To prevent this from happening, you must write in your Declaration of Land Patent only the legal description of the property to which you are an assignee. In other words, the legal description from your deed or abstract is what you must use. For this reason, the enclosed Declaration of Land Patent has in it, adequate language for this purpose. A Declaration of Homestead should be attached to your Declaration of Land Patent, but the legal description in your Declaration of Homestead must be 160 acres or less to comply with Federal Law on filing Homesteads. Along with the declaration of Land Patent and the Declaration of Homestead is a certified copy of the original land patent which you can obtain from your nearest land office. These papers are all stapled together and filed in either your County Recorder's office or with the Register of Deeds.
DO NOT SEND CHECKS. SEND MONEY ORDERS ONLY / MAKE PAYABLE TO: Bureau of Land Management
After you receive your copy of the original Land Patent or Land Grant, then staple it to a Declaration of Land Patent and file it in your County Recorder's office or Register of Deeds. You now have your allodial title. If you haven't filed a Declaration of Homestead, then you should do so and attach it to your Land Patent. You may file a Declaration of Homestead on up to 160 [64] acres, but not more. A Declaration of Homestead can only be filed on property that you actually live on. A Land Patent can only be filed on property that has been assigned to you. You don't file one on your neighbor's property or they can sue you for slandering his title.
A Declaration of Homestead should be filed whether or not you file a Land Patent. It may be filed with, before, or after your lawsuit is filed. Both Land Patents and Declarations of Homestead must be Notarized. A sample of both are enclosed. Make photocopies of both before using them or you may retype your own.
After your Land Patent is filed, you must send a photocopy by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to your bank or mortgage company, FLB, FMRA, PCA, etc and to any and all parties that may have an equitable interest in your property so they have been placed on NOTICE that you are updating the Land Patent in your name and they will have 60 days to challenge your claim to your allodial title in a court of law or forever keep their silence. Be sure to keep your green tickets when they come back.
GIVING NOTICE IS A BASIC PRINCIPLE OF LAW. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT
LAND OFFICES ORIGINALLY ISSUED THE LAND PATENTS, THEY PUBLISHED
THE LAND PATENT WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 60 DAYS: WHEN NOT
CHALLENGED BY ANYONE, THE LAND PATENT WAS THEN GRANTED. AN
ALTERNATIVE WAY TO GIVE THE OTHER PARTY NOTICE IS TO PUBLISH A
"NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT" in a legal publication in your county
of residence.
Include the legal description on your property in the ad with this warning: "If any party having a claim, lien or debt or other equitable interest fails to file a suit in a court of law within 60 days [65] from the date of filing or on (insert date), then they shall waive all future claims against this land and it will become the property and allodial freehold of the Assignee to said Patent. (your name - Assignee)
Essentially, a Land Patent is the first conveyance of title ownership to land which the U.S. Government grants a citizen who applies for one. One of the earliest laws for granting Land Patents was passed by Congress on April 24, 1820. Among other things, Congress set up Government Land officers, now known as the Bureau of Land Management. Land was usually sold in parcels of 160 acres for $1.25 per acre. The law in 1820 prohibited the borrowing or use of "credit" for the purchase of government land. In the debates in Congress prior to passage of this act, Senator King of New York said in March 1820 ... "it was calculated to plant in the new country a population of independent unembarrassed freeholder ... that it would place , in every man, the Power to Purchase a freehold. the price of which could be cleared in 3 years... that it would cut up speculation and monopoly ... that it would prevent the accumulation of alarming debt which experience proved never would and never could be paid" !!! (emphasis added) Later on, in 1862, a Homestead Act stated in Section 4: "That no lands acquired under the provisions of this act shall in any event become liable to the satisfaction of any debt or debts contracted prior to the issuing of the patent therefor".
It can be clearly seen that the intent of these early lawmakers was for the people of this country to be FREEMEN AND FREEHOLDERS of their land, and not ever be subject to have it taken from them by any government, feudal authority or banker or any other party who might have a claim against the person who owned the land. In plain English, a Land Patent which gave you an allodial freehold, that was "judgement proof and yes- even immune from tax liens. In [60] effect, the only authority over you or your land was GOD himself. In England, a man, who owned free from authority of the king, was known as a freeholder and his land as a freehold or allodial freehold. Most land patents in the U.S. were issued prior to 1900. However, even today, new land patents continue to be issued, mostly for gas, oil and mineral rights on public lands. For this reason, there are several land offices that remain open in the United States.
WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A LAND PATENT?
On the basis of all the case law I have seen, there is no doubt in my mind that a land patent issued by the Bureau of Land Management which gives you a title at law is far superior to any title acquired in equity. such as a sheriff's deed. The land patent will, therefore, prevent your ejectment and removal from the land or the property you occupy on the land. The debts or claims of other parties will remain, but the land will be removed from assets which they can attach. The law is on the books today which says that any debts, which lie against the land, that existed prior to the land patent being issued, are removed from the land. The next question is; if the land patents were issued 100 or more years ago to persons who are no longer alive, and if I now reside on only a portion of the land that was originally described in the original land patent, then how do I bring up the land patent in my name'? And if I bring it up in my name, will it remove the land as security which the Bank or Mortgage Company can sell and seize in a foreclosure action? [61]
DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT
The procedures which I will describe are not time tested, as they have not worked their way through the U.S. Supreme Court. This does not mean that these procedures will not ultimately be successful. Any basis for a legal approach must be supported by a legal theory. We already know and can substantiate that an original land patent will protect your land from any equitable or collateral attack. However, we do not know for certain that the existing procedures will vest in us the same rights and immunities by filing a DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT, and updating it in your name. However, since there is little to lose and possibly much to gain, it would be wise to file a DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT, in the future event that it is sustained.
The theory is based on two premises. First, in the original land patent, that was granted, lets say 100 years ago the land patent document itself says that this patent is granted to the original party AS WELL AS TO THEIR HEIRS AND ASSIGNS. While most of us are not heirs, ARE NOT WE ALL ASSIGNS? Since land patents were originally issued, nearly all conveyances of title were done by the use of deeds, like Quit Claim Deeds and Warranty Deeds. However, the money lenders found a way around land patents by creating, new paper instruments like deeds of trust and mortgages, all of which convey equitable interests. However, the land patent its remains the highest title at law, and few persons have updated a land patent in their name. Where a land patent exists, no lien or mortgage could be ever placed on the land. Since the intent of the lawmakers is the law, historic evidence shows that our founding fathers wanted us to own the land [62] in its entirety, and subject to the claims of no other man or government or other institution. Because the laws were passed by Congress setting up Land Offices to grant land patents, the best jurisdiction in which to raise these issues are the Federal Courts.
In the Declaration of Land Patent, we then declare that we are the ASSIGNEE'S of the original land patent, even though we may be 2nd,..3rd, 4th, etc., after the party to whom the original patent was issued. TO LET YOU KNOW HOW SERIOUS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS TAKING THESE DECLARATIONS OF LAND PATENTS, Don Walker has recently stated: "That in Illinois, he personally knows of a farmer who applied for a $500,000 loan and was told by the Federal Land Bank that it would be granted if he removed his Declaration of Land Patent. Also, the FLB is now itself applying for and filing Declarations of Land Patents on farms it is "foreclosing on". We have also learned that oil, gas and coal companies are filing these declarations on land already titled in their name through deeds. Also, Dennis Schlueter of Fort Collins, Colorado has stated: he knows of banks who are foreclosing on mortgages, that are then filing these DECLARATIONS OF LAND PATENTS on the property that they just foreclosed on. Now if these land patents were worthless pieces of paper, then why is everybody jumping on the bandwagon?
After the review of several different land patents, the one enclosed in this paper is, considered the one that best sums up what is to be said. [63]
The one major pitfall, that must be avoided, is that when filing the declaration of land patents, do not place the same legal description in the declarations that was in the original land patent issued by the Bureau of Land Management. What this does is cloud the title to the property of other persons who are living in properties that are part of the legal description of the original land patent. As a result, several lawsuits were filed to quiet title. To prevent this from happening, you must write in your Declaration of Land Patent only the legal description of the property to which you are an assignee. In other words, the legal description from your deed or abstract is what you must use. For this reason, the enclosed Declaration of Land Patent has in it, adequate language for this purpose. A Declaration of Homestead should be attached to your Declaration of Land Patent, but the legal description in your Declaration of Homestead must be 160 acres or less to comply with Federal Law on filing Homesteads. Along with the declaration of Land Patent and the Declaration of Homestead is a certified copy of the original land patent which you can obtain from your nearest land office. These papers are all stapled together and filed in either your County Recorder's office or with the Register of Deeds.
DO NOT SEND CHECKS. SEND MONEY ORDERS ONLY / MAKE PAYABLE TO: Bureau of Land Management
After you receive your copy of the original Land Patent or Land Grant, then staple it to a Declaration of Land Patent and file it in your County Recorder's office or Register of Deeds. You now have your allodial title. If you haven't filed a Declaration of Homestead, then you should do so and attach it to your Land Patent. You may file a Declaration of Homestead on up to 160 [64] acres, but not more. A Declaration of Homestead can only be filed on property that you actually live on. A Land Patent can only be filed on property that has been assigned to you. You don't file one on your neighbor's property or they can sue you for slandering his title.
A Declaration of Homestead should be filed whether or not you file a Land Patent. It may be filed with, before, or after your lawsuit is filed. Both Land Patents and Declarations of Homestead must be Notarized. A sample of both are enclosed. Make photocopies of both before using them or you may retype your own.
After your Land Patent is filed, you must send a photocopy by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to your bank or mortgage company, FLB, FMRA, PCA, etc and to any and all parties that may have an equitable interest in your property so they have been placed on NOTICE that you are updating the Land Patent in your name and they will have 60 days to challenge your claim to your allodial title in a court of law or forever keep their silence. Be sure to keep your green tickets when they come back.
GIVING NOTICE IS A BASIC PRINCIPLE OF LAW. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT
LAND OFFICES ORIGINALLY ISSUED THE LAND PATENTS, THEY PUBLISHED
THE LAND PATENT WITH LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 60 DAYS: WHEN NOT
CHALLENGED BY ANYONE, THE LAND PATENT WAS THEN GRANTED. AN
ALTERNATIVE WAY TO GIVE THE OTHER PARTY NOTICE IS TO PUBLISH A
"NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF LAND PATENT" in a legal publication in your county
of residence.
Include the legal description on your property in the ad with this warning: "If any party having a claim, lien or debt or other equitable interest fails to file a suit in a court of law within 60 days [65] from the date of filing or on (insert date), then they shall waive all future claims against this land and it will become the property and allodial freehold of the Assignee to said Patent. (your name - Assignee)
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
A Claim of Right from John-Henry :Doe
John Key, the man acting as the Prime Minister for New Zealand;
Christopher Finlayson, the man acting as Attorney General for New Zealand;
David Collins, the man acting as Solicitor General for New Zealand;
Pieri Munro, the man acting as Wellington Chief of Police;
Dear Madams and Sirs:
I am serving herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and my Claim of Right and my Notice of Denial of Consent for your understanding.
You will find the enclosed intact and complete, for now.
Yours truly,
John-Henry :Doe,
Freeman-on-the-Land
Affidavit - Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
I, a flesh and blood living soul commonly known as John-Henry of the Doe family, living on a geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, having no corporate status, do hereby state under oath that the following is my Truth and my Law.
Whereas:
It is my understanding that:
1. The only and true jurisdiction that Man can be part of is the one from his creator: Life. Life is also known as the Universe, God, the Source, Nature, Love or the Creation. Life is self aware and speaks to itself through the Heart, and;
2. The only Laws that apply to Man are the Laws of Creation also known as the Divine Laws, the Laws of Nature, the Laws of Love or the Laws of the Universe and those Laws are written into the Heart of Man, and;
3. I am a Man, and;
4. Any system of laws that are not of Life are of man, and;
5. The only jurisdiction to which I willfully and completely consent is the one from within my own Heart and I call it Love, and;
6. Out of necessity, compassion, love and to the best interest of peace for all of those who believe that only the laws of man exist and apply to all, I allow myself to be seen by systems created by man through the different interfaces that those systems provide without, nevertheless, me consenting to their jurisdiction over me, and;
7. A Man is born out of Love whereas a corporation is born out of money. It is therefore impossible for a Man to give or receive money since the only thing a Man can give or receive is Love, and;
8. All the people living on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand enjoy the protection of the common law, and;
9. Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and;
10. The law of agent and principal applies, therefore, service upon one is service upon both, and;
21. Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and;
11. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and;
13. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and;
14. For something to exist legally, it must have a name, and;
15. The Law Societies and Bar Associations of New Zealand are the ones who create the statutes and therefore they are applicable only to their members and to those that consent, and;
16. The only form of government recognized as lawful in the area commonly referred to as New Zealand is a representative one, and;
17. All governments are corporations which provide services, and;
18. All governments and corporations, including all of their agents, are bound by the Crimes Act 1961, and;
19. Representation requires mutual consent, and;
20. In the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist and;
22. Those who have an IRD (Inland Revenue Department) Number and are using it for employment are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government for its employees, and;
23. It is lawful to abandon an IRD number, and,
24. People living on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand have the right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and;
25. If anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and;
26. Section 53 of the Crimes Act 1961 establishes a claim of right as a Lawful excuse, and;
27. If one is in possession of personal property under a claim of right, one is justified to protect or to appoint anyone to protect that property with protection from criminal responsibility for defending that property, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it and that factual truth is expressed in Section 53 of the Crimes Act 1961, and;
28. Section 107 of the Crimes Act 1961 acknowledges the right to disobey statutes if one has a lawful excuse, or a claim of right, and;
29. Section 56C of the Judicature Act 1908 acknowledges the right to disobey court orders if one has a lawful excuse, or a claim of right, and
30. A Freeman-on-the-Land is one who has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and;
31. I, known as John-Henry: Doe, am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and;
32. Acting peacefully within common law standards is not unlawful, and;
33. All transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties, and;
34. Any action for which one can apply and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
35. I, known as John-Henry: Doe, a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility am not a child of the state. I do not need to ask permission to engage in lawful/legitimate and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and;
36. Peace officers have two roles, first as peace officers and secondly as policy enforcement officers (also known as police officers) and that the latter acting against a Freeman-on-the-Land is in fact breaking the Law, and;
37. A by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and;
38. Corporations are legal fictions that require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and;
39. For any party to be justified to order payment from another party, there must be a valid contract, and;
40. I can use a Notary Public to perform duties found under any Act. Thus they have the power to hold court and hear evidence and issue binding legal judgments, and;
41. If the Notary fails in their Duty, then they have abandoned their post, and;
41. Personal property is defined as any thing lawfully in the possession of someone, and;
42. I have a right to use my personal property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
43. No one is obliged to have a legal name or to give it freely to anyone demanding it, and;
44. I have a right to claim an amount of acres that I will judge appropriate and fair, of uninhabited land anywhere on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand or the Commonwealth, and;
45. A Freeman-on-the-Land can travel freely within the commonwealth, and;
46. A summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the New Zealand Securities Commission create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and;
46. Peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and Law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and;
47. I have the power and right to refuse any transaction or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and;
48. Breach the peace is defined as intentionally, physically hurting another human being or intentionally damaging someone else's personal property or committing any kind of unlawful action in a contract, and;
49. Permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time mentioned hereunder, and;
Therefore be it resolved and known to any and all concerned and effected parties, that I, known as John-Henry: Doe, a Freeman-on-the-Land, do hereby state clearly, specifically and unequivocally my intent:
50. To peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations and/or restrictions, and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter, and;
51. To travel peacefully and lawfully on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand and the Commonwealth by whatever means I deem necessary, and;
52. To be a Steward of the land and waters of the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand and the Commonwealth including the land to which I lay claim, and;
53. To not pay taxes, for the collection of taxes is a function of government and with my denial of consent I will free myself completely from all governing bodies, agencies and institutions, and;
Furthermore I claim:
53. That these actions are not outside my neighbors standards and will in fact support said neighbors in our common desire for truth and maximum freedom, and;
54. The right to engage in these actions and further claim that all personal property held by me is held under a Claim of Right in accordance with Section 53 of the Crimes Act 1961, and;
55. The right to, at any time, appoint peace officers to protect me and/or my personal property from anyone who would attempt to take it, and;
56. That anyone, their principals or their agents who interfere with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fail to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure, and;
57. That the courts in New Zealand are de facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services, and;
58. That my consent to perform on any statutory obligation can only be granted by a written, signed and Notarized document, and;
59. That I do hereby deny consent to any transactions of a security interest issued under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act, and;
60. The unlimited right to travel freely and unmolested throughout the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms and that evidenced perfection of this Claim will act as sufficient documentation for entry and travel to and on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms, and;
61. The right to enjoy the unmolested pursuit of my activities and free use of the streets, avenues, highways and public roads, and;
62. The free, exclusive, unlimited and unrestricted right to use my personal property, and;
63. The right to direct my life and all of my activities the way I see fit, and;
64. The right to generate lawful excuse, which is a general term, which includes all of the defenses which the common law considers sufficient reason to excuse a human being from criminal liability, and;
65. The right to claim an area of uninhabited land anywhere in the geographic area commonly referred to as New Zealand, and;
66. The right to deregister anything that has been registered by me, and;
67. The right to establish for me or anyone under my care a FEE SCHEDULE for any transgression(s) against me, my family or anyone under my care that is or are perpetrated by peace officers, government principals, agents or justice system participants, those fees being FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated, and ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) PER HOUR if handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent, and a minimum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS($1 000 000.00) for any violence brought against me, my family or anyone under my care, and TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10 000.00) PER DAY if any personal property is being taken away from me without my express written and Notarized consent, and;
68. The right to choose a lawful method of payment upon demand, and;
69. The right to use a Notary Public, commissioner or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or anyone under my care or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way, and;
70. The right to engage the services of a Notary Public or commissioner for taking affidavits and/or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to attest to my signature for verification purposes, and which does not constitute adhesion, contract or change in status in any manner, and;
71. The right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms, and;
72. The right to provide for myself or anyone who wants it, any service provided by the Government of New Zealand;
73. The right to use any service provided by the Government of New Zealand that I deem necessary without it affecting my status as a Freeman-on-the-Land, and;
74. The right to keep and use as I see fit any and all inheritances given to me, and;
75. The right to determine what is best for me, my family and anyone under my care, and;
76. The right to govern myself accordingly, and;
77. The right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video or audio tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit, and;
78. The right to refuse any service or intervention by any level of government, and;
79. The right to have, in the event of my death, all of my personal property and inheritances that I pass on, protected by this Claim and that my Will is my final word.
Directions for response
l Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or to make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) DAYS of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the notary's office herein provided no later than TEN (10) DAYS from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service, and;
l Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against myself a Freeman-on-the-Land known as John-Henry of the Doe family, and;
l Use of a notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.
The place of claim of right, geographical area known as Town, City, New Zealand.
Signed and witnessed this _____ day of the month of ________________ in the year two thousand and ten.
(Claimant - print) (Autograph of claimant)
In witness to the above signature:
(Witness - print) (Autograph of witness)
Send counterclaims and/or disputes to:
ATTENTION: John-Henry :Doe
Notice of Denial of Consent
DATE: ________________________________________
Whereas:
1. New Zealand enjoys a common law jurisdiction, and;
2. Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and;
3. In a common law jurisdiction no one can claim the right or power to adjudicate any matter without the consent of both parties, and;
4. Without my consent no lawful adjudication concerning myself may occur, and;
5. I do hereby, claim the right inalienable by any government agent to engage in discussion either directly or through an agent prior to consenting to any adjudication or administrative tribunal or other process which may generate a security interest, and;
6. I do claim said right has been denied to me by human beings acting as government agents in a common law jurisdiction, and;
7. I do hereby, re-extend my offer of discussion and negotiation in order to avoid conflict, and;
8. Seeking conflict as a government agent in a court of law in the absence of discussion or negotiation is a denial of basic fundamental rights, a dishonor, and an abuse of process, and;
9. Said dishonor, denial and abuse does cause the administration of justice to appear to be dragged into disrepute, and;
10. I am compelled by my honour and Faith to refuse to be party to any action which may be seen to drag the administration of justice into disrepute, and;
11. I do believe the path of peace is always available to those of good will, and;
12. I am peaceful and of goodwill, and;
13. I do believe peace is a fundamental right and the basic justification for government, and;
14. Consenting to an adversarial relationship in the absence of good faith discussion and negotiation is a breach of my Faith, and;
15. Abusing the judicial process and forcing me to breach the terms of my Faith is completely unacceptable to me,
Therefore be it resolved and known to any and all concerned:
That I, a human being in a common law jurisdiction in no way consent to any adjudication process of any sort by any party and that said denial of consent remains in force until any plaintiff or claimant honours the existing offer to discuss and negotiate in good faith and pure trust and under full commercial liability.
This notice is served in the interest of justice, without malice of forethought, ill will, vexation or frivolity and suffices as notice of a claim by the Affiant that a plaintiff or claimant is apparently abusing process for financial or other gain and thus causing the administration to be dragged into disrepute.
Affiant: ____________________________________________
Witnessed: ___________________________________________
Note: The use of a witness or witnesses is for the purpose of verification of identity and attestation in a common law jurisdiction only and does not constitute a change in status, consent or existence as anything except a free human being.
Sincerely yours,
John-Henry :Doe
Christopher Finlayson, the man acting as Attorney General for New Zealand;
David Collins, the man acting as Solicitor General for New Zealand;
Pieri Munro, the man acting as Wellington Chief of Police;
Dear Madams and Sirs:
I am serving herewith, my Notice of Understanding and Intent and my Claim of Right and my Notice of Denial of Consent for your understanding.
You will find the enclosed intact and complete, for now.
Yours truly,
John-Henry :Doe,
Freeman-on-the-Land
Affidavit - Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
I, a flesh and blood living soul commonly known as John-Henry of the Doe family, living on a geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, having no corporate status, do hereby state under oath that the following is my Truth and my Law.
Whereas:
It is my understanding that:
1. The only and true jurisdiction that Man can be part of is the one from his creator: Life. Life is also known as the Universe, God, the Source, Nature, Love or the Creation. Life is self aware and speaks to itself through the Heart, and;
2. The only Laws that apply to Man are the Laws of Creation also known as the Divine Laws, the Laws of Nature, the Laws of Love or the Laws of the Universe and those Laws are written into the Heart of Man, and;
3. I am a Man, and;
4. Any system of laws that are not of Life are of man, and;
5. The only jurisdiction to which I willfully and completely consent is the one from within my own Heart and I call it Love, and;
6. Out of necessity, compassion, love and to the best interest of peace for all of those who believe that only the laws of man exist and apply to all, I allow myself to be seen by systems created by man through the different interfaces that those systems provide without, nevertheless, me consenting to their jurisdiction over me, and;
7. A Man is born out of Love whereas a corporation is born out of money. It is therefore impossible for a Man to give or receive money since the only thing a Man can give or receive is Love, and;
8. All the people living on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand enjoy the protection of the common law, and;
9. Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and;
10. The law of agent and principal applies, therefore, service upon one is service upon both, and;
21. Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and;
11. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and;
13. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and;
14. For something to exist legally, it must have a name, and;
15. The Law Societies and Bar Associations of New Zealand are the ones who create the statutes and therefore they are applicable only to their members and to those that consent, and;
16. The only form of government recognized as lawful in the area commonly referred to as New Zealand is a representative one, and;
17. All governments are corporations which provide services, and;
18. All governments and corporations, including all of their agents, are bound by the Crimes Act 1961, and;
19. Representation requires mutual consent, and;
20. In the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist and;
22. Those who have an IRD (Inland Revenue Department) Number and are using it for employment are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government for its employees, and;
23. It is lawful to abandon an IRD number, and,
24. People living on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand have the right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and;
25. If anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and;
26. Section 53 of the Crimes Act 1961 establishes a claim of right as a Lawful excuse, and;
27. If one is in possession of personal property under a claim of right, one is justified to protect or to appoint anyone to protect that property with protection from criminal responsibility for defending that property, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it and that factual truth is expressed in Section 53 of the Crimes Act 1961, and;
28. Section 107 of the Crimes Act 1961 acknowledges the right to disobey statutes if one has a lawful excuse, or a claim of right, and;
29. Section 56C of the Judicature Act 1908 acknowledges the right to disobey court orders if one has a lawful excuse, or a claim of right, and
30. A Freeman-on-the-Land is one who has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and;
31. I, known as John-Henry: Doe, am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and;
32. Acting peacefully within common law standards is not unlawful, and;
33. All transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties, and;
34. Any action for which one can apply and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
35. I, known as John-Henry: Doe, a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility am not a child of the state. I do not need to ask permission to engage in lawful/legitimate and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and;
36. Peace officers have two roles, first as peace officers and secondly as policy enforcement officers (also known as police officers) and that the latter acting against a Freeman-on-the-Land is in fact breaking the Law, and;
37. A by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and;
38. Corporations are legal fictions that require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and;
39. For any party to be justified to order payment from another party, there must be a valid contract, and;
40. I can use a Notary Public to perform duties found under any Act. Thus they have the power to hold court and hear evidence and issue binding legal judgments, and;
41. If the Notary fails in their Duty, then they have abandoned their post, and;
41. Personal property is defined as any thing lawfully in the possession of someone, and;
42. I have a right to use my personal property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
43. No one is obliged to have a legal name or to give it freely to anyone demanding it, and;
44. I have a right to claim an amount of acres that I will judge appropriate and fair, of uninhabited land anywhere on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand or the Commonwealth, and;
45. A Freeman-on-the-Land can travel freely within the commonwealth, and;
46. A summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the New Zealand Securities Commission create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and;
46. Peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and Law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and;
47. I have the power and right to refuse any transaction or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and;
48. Breach the peace is defined as intentionally, physically hurting another human being or intentionally damaging someone else's personal property or committing any kind of unlawful action in a contract, and;
49. Permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time mentioned hereunder, and;
Therefore be it resolved and known to any and all concerned and effected parties, that I, known as John-Henry: Doe, a Freeman-on-the-Land, do hereby state clearly, specifically and unequivocally my intent:
50. To peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations and/or restrictions, and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter, and;
51. To travel peacefully and lawfully on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand and the Commonwealth by whatever means I deem necessary, and;
52. To be a Steward of the land and waters of the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand and the Commonwealth including the land to which I lay claim, and;
53. To not pay taxes, for the collection of taxes is a function of government and with my denial of consent I will free myself completely from all governing bodies, agencies and institutions, and;
Furthermore I claim:
53. That these actions are not outside my neighbors standards and will in fact support said neighbors in our common desire for truth and maximum freedom, and;
54. The right to engage in these actions and further claim that all personal property held by me is held under a Claim of Right in accordance with Section 53 of the Crimes Act 1961, and;
55. The right to, at any time, appoint peace officers to protect me and/or my personal property from anyone who would attempt to take it, and;
56. That anyone, their principals or their agents who interfere with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fail to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure, and;
57. That the courts in New Zealand are de facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services, and;
58. That my consent to perform on any statutory obligation can only be granted by a written, signed and Notarized document, and;
59. That I do hereby deny consent to any transactions of a security interest issued under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act, and;
60. The unlimited right to travel freely and unmolested throughout the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms and that evidenced perfection of this Claim will act as sufficient documentation for entry and travel to and on the geographical area commonly referred to as New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth realms, and;
61. The right to enjoy the unmolested pursuit of my activities and free use of the streets, avenues, highways and public roads, and;
62. The free, exclusive, unlimited and unrestricted right to use my personal property, and;
63. The right to direct my life and all of my activities the way I see fit, and;
64. The right to generate lawful excuse, which is a general term, which includes all of the defenses which the common law considers sufficient reason to excuse a human being from criminal liability, and;
65. The right to claim an area of uninhabited land anywhere in the geographic area commonly referred to as New Zealand, and;
66. The right to deregister anything that has been registered by me, and;
67. The right to establish for me or anyone under my care a FEE SCHEDULE for any transgression(s) against me, my family or anyone under my care that is or are perpetrated by peace officers, government principals, agents or justice system participants, those fees being FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated, and ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) PER HOUR if handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent, and a minimum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS($1 000 000.00) for any violence brought against me, my family or anyone under my care, and TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10 000.00) PER DAY if any personal property is being taken away from me without my express written and Notarized consent, and;
68. The right to choose a lawful method of payment upon demand, and;
69. The right to use a Notary Public, commissioner or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or anyone under my care or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way, and;
70. The right to engage the services of a Notary Public or commissioner for taking affidavits and/or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to attest to my signature for verification purposes, and which does not constitute adhesion, contract or change in status in any manner, and;
71. The right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms, and;
72. The right to provide for myself or anyone who wants it, any service provided by the Government of New Zealand;
73. The right to use any service provided by the Government of New Zealand that I deem necessary without it affecting my status as a Freeman-on-the-Land, and;
74. The right to keep and use as I see fit any and all inheritances given to me, and;
75. The right to determine what is best for me, my family and anyone under my care, and;
76. The right to govern myself accordingly, and;
77. The right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video or audio tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit, and;
78. The right to refuse any service or intervention by any level of government, and;
79. The right to have, in the event of my death, all of my personal property and inheritances that I pass on, protected by this Claim and that my Will is my final word.
Directions for response
l Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or to make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) DAYS of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the notary's office herein provided no later than TEN (10) DAYS from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service, and;
l Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against myself a Freeman-on-the-Land known as John-Henry of the Doe family, and;
l Use of a notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.
The place of claim of right, geographical area known as Town, City, New Zealand.
Signed and witnessed this _____ day of the month of ________________ in the year two thousand and ten.
(Claimant - print) (Autograph of claimant)
In witness to the above signature:
(Witness - print) (Autograph of witness)
Send counterclaims and/or disputes to:
ATTENTION: John-Henry :Doe
Notice of Denial of Consent
DATE: ________________________________________
Whereas:
1. New Zealand enjoys a common law jurisdiction, and;
2. Equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and;
3. In a common law jurisdiction no one can claim the right or power to adjudicate any matter without the consent of both parties, and;
4. Without my consent no lawful adjudication concerning myself may occur, and;
5. I do hereby, claim the right inalienable by any government agent to engage in discussion either directly or through an agent prior to consenting to any adjudication or administrative tribunal or other process which may generate a security interest, and;
6. I do claim said right has been denied to me by human beings acting as government agents in a common law jurisdiction, and;
7. I do hereby, re-extend my offer of discussion and negotiation in order to avoid conflict, and;
8. Seeking conflict as a government agent in a court of law in the absence of discussion or negotiation is a denial of basic fundamental rights, a dishonor, and an abuse of process, and;
9. Said dishonor, denial and abuse does cause the administration of justice to appear to be dragged into disrepute, and;
10. I am compelled by my honour and Faith to refuse to be party to any action which may be seen to drag the administration of justice into disrepute, and;
11. I do believe the path of peace is always available to those of good will, and;
12. I am peaceful and of goodwill, and;
13. I do believe peace is a fundamental right and the basic justification for government, and;
14. Consenting to an adversarial relationship in the absence of good faith discussion and negotiation is a breach of my Faith, and;
15. Abusing the judicial process and forcing me to breach the terms of my Faith is completely unacceptable to me,
Therefore be it resolved and known to any and all concerned:
That I, a human being in a common law jurisdiction in no way consent to any adjudication process of any sort by any party and that said denial of consent remains in force until any plaintiff or claimant honours the existing offer to discuss and negotiate in good faith and pure trust and under full commercial liability.
This notice is served in the interest of justice, without malice of forethought, ill will, vexation or frivolity and suffices as notice of a claim by the Affiant that a plaintiff or claimant is apparently abusing process for financial or other gain and thus causing the administration to be dragged into disrepute.
Affiant: ____________________________________________
Witnessed: ___________________________________________
Note: The use of a witness or witnesses is for the purpose of verification of identity and attestation in a common law jurisdiction only and does not constitute a change in status, consent or existence as anything except a free human being.
Sincerely yours,
John-Henry :Doe
Friday, July 29, 2011
My Musical Philosophy
The MPC is a new age instrument that both flips the old age and builds upon it.
The samples are my keys and/or pitches.
I design my scales by collecting samples using my personal disposition's discretion.
I design my chords by layering the samples in the newly established scales.
Then, I apply all of the avantgarde methods and theories into this new age musical medium.
The timbre is the musical genre of the sample
The cadencing is either designed by my sample selection's chord progression, or desgined by my preffered chop on the pitch roll.
The metre is my chosen sequencing of the scale samples.
By using this new philosophy I bridge the gap between melody and rhythm so that they both can be conceptualized identically.
My new philosphy is the integration of our contemporary notion of music into a new and next-level notion.
Every integral must have a constant.
So now it is my quest that I apply myself towards discovering the essence of this newly found constant.
However i do know that this constant lies in the pitch, cadence, metre, timbre, etcetera of the samples used.
I know this because the constant is always derived from the root which is that which is being integrated.
Just imagine a musical medium where the keys have pitches, cadences, metres, timbres, etcetera of their own.
That's my philosophy!
The samples are my keys and/or pitches.
I design my scales by collecting samples using my personal disposition's discretion.
I design my chords by layering the samples in the newly established scales.
Then, I apply all of the avantgarde methods and theories into this new age musical medium.
The timbre is the musical genre of the sample
The cadencing is either designed by my sample selection's chord progression, or desgined by my preffered chop on the pitch roll.
The metre is my chosen sequencing of the scale samples.
By using this new philosophy I bridge the gap between melody and rhythm so that they both can be conceptualized identically.
My new philosphy is the integration of our contemporary notion of music into a new and next-level notion.
Every integral must have a constant.
So now it is my quest that I apply myself towards discovering the essence of this newly found constant.
However i do know that this constant lies in the pitch, cadence, metre, timbre, etcetera of the samples used.
I know this because the constant is always derived from the root which is that which is being integrated.
Just imagine a musical medium where the keys have pitches, cadences, metres, timbres, etcetera of their own.
That's my philosophy!
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
I Need Nobody
Drop the beats. awkwardly.
cats get defeated when they step in my region.
i kill them and slay them upon the pavement.
..razor shave their fucking head.
shave the skin folicle. epidermis.
the word is these herb kids need a good learnin
I teach y'all, to craft a rhyme right.
i rap in the limelight my divine sight
seeking mcs stepin my direction,
y'all can't win the race! who's style are you testing??
mention me kripped khemist.
a blessed beat be your menace.
You can't drop on this, you can't obviously
drop a fifth of the rhymes that I do.
limerics, haikus I cruise through mind fumes.
my kung fu styles like
1, 2 WOW!
Fuckin suckers try to step to me.
Ha! its like pow blaow blao.
Punched in the frame crane Beak upper
-cut right to your face.
style is putrid you get just a fucking taste....
of the basket case, who raps the greatest.
cats get defeated when they step in my region.
i kill them and slay them upon the pavement.
..razor shave their fucking head.
shave the skin folicle. epidermis.
the word is these herb kids need a good learnin
I teach y'all, to craft a rhyme right.
i rap in the limelight my divine sight
seeking mcs stepin my direction,
y'all can't win the race! who's style are you testing??
mention me kripped khemist.
a blessed beat be your menace.
You can't drop on this, you can't obviously
drop a fifth of the rhymes that I do.
limerics, haikus I cruise through mind fumes.
my kung fu styles like
1, 2 WOW!
Fuckin suckers try to step to me.
Ha! its like pow blaow blao.
Punched in the frame crane Beak upper
-cut right to your face.
style is putrid you get just a fucking taste....
of the basket case, who raps the greatest.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Is and Isn't
By W. Rabbit.
It is the tradition of people to rely on the intellect, on being able to understand rationally, to limit the unknown to the known and translate perception. It is commonplace to use our intellect to explain things to others or enable things to be explained to us which we do not understand – and naturalt to make the effort to explain things that cannot be explained. Explanation, however it plays out, is suitable/servicable for many things, for things in general – but it is not difficult to demonstrate the restraint built into language as a means to communicate, or show that it involves a prejudice of time and space used as the basis for its model of understanding. This model cannot be changed or evolved to explain certain things because of its inherent duality and the present lack of understanding of the power of a duality-driven mindset – moreover the model contains within itself by virtue of its duality a self-regulating gyroscope that causes language to perpetuate duality – and itself like an unchanging fractal that falls into itself forever.
This can be illustrated quite easily by the observation that the order of words has a direct result on the reader (who percieves) – and reacts. How you react is for all intents and purposes random – but that you react is not. We can see that Ideas, as communicated by others are perhaps never simply accepted as a pure communication that passes exactly what the writer had in mind onto paper or screen – they almost always generate conflict – as if the writer is unable to capture an objective statement of truth no matter what words they choose to use, how carefully they phrase them, or how ever many clauses and asterisks and footnotes they may include. Writing, tends to have an automatic effect of causing a reaction rather than a reflexion. Caution at this point is advised against imposing a moral conclusion over this fact – my concern is never whether this process is “good” or “bad” but simply to illustrate and prove the existence of the process. By reaction I mean an unconscious pull by the ego to respond to the stimulus received – however it chooses to interpret it, and by reflexion I mean a contemplative state of occult and self awareness that recognizes one has reactions but does not automatically obey them as prompted by the ego.
The point of A-causal to Zen is not to provide another phenomena on which to hang ones causal hat, nor provide another point in space to speculate intellectually – however causally titillating the temptation and rewarding/gratifying the poetic associations that flow in tribute – but represents a faint light in the distance of the logos that dawns from time to time in the face of contemplation. It is borne of the struggle to escape language, morality, duality, time and those dead weights we recycle in absurdio when faced with the prospect of something we are told we cannot know. It is the gnosis that jettisons causal spatial suppositions – spurns our doctrine of cartesian grid unconsciously imposed that orders phenomena to be ‘from’, ‘within’, ‘next to’, ‘outside’, ‘inside’, ‘beyond’ – simplifying the vast into the discrete using tensions that imply the existence of singular autonomous points. Unfortunately, in the desire to share, experience is written down, all too often profaning the mystery because of the means by which its message is carried.
The attempt to try to Know unhinges any knowing precisely because Words – those causal prisoners and jailers – are used to denote occulture. As soon as the word a-causal presents itself it undergoes a transformation, literal and literary. Its presence creates a shadow, an order, and is forcibly slotted into various heirarchies – pushed into and out of place by the law of words that draws some together and pushes other apart – an automatic dichotomy inherent in the supposed freedom of language to express. Viz. express freely – but within the limits of freedom.
In word or form the a-causal comes under verbal law. It becomes a ‘thing’ like all other mundane things, disposable, drained of wonder, drained of authenticity. As is the doctrine of verbal law, the word/sound/form once presenced causally is subject to the laws of form. Its name, used as a key to point toward a wordless door, a silent desert that rebukes understanding – is abused, misunderstood and sullied by clumsy attempts to extrapolate its purity with a barrage of associations and connective verbal tissues. It is thrown into the morass of language, sat next to words it has no sincere desire to be with, and forced to represent our will for it to be the occult secret itself. Causality supposes –this- and –that- to make separations where there are only prejudiced traditions of experiencing the world through the window of the human-centred ego. We cannot imagine what would be without our license to suppose, and it is ironic that our faith in knowledge prevents the evolution of it.
The word a-causal denotes an anti-concept, a sound for a vacuum of meaning outside the framework we conveniently apply. It does not denote a thing, a state, a term, word, or inference available to us through language – it is outside of language, indeed outside of languages ability to relate or even present – and that is precisely the words/sounds point – as a stop sign indicating the city limits of perception.
Like Zen before it, it is subjected to the same problems all words create – no matter what occult (hidden) wisdom they attempt to convey – once a word, immediately a form. Using a frame of reference built with instituted causal tools and prejudices people attach all manner of meaning and explaination to weigh down the sublime. To suppose nothing we must suppose something. How many ways have people tried to show Nothing. When it comes to the acausal people cannot leave well enough alone.
We build up a causal model of something we simply cannot fathom – precisely because we cannot fathom it. Precisely because we have a word like fathom and hate to waste it! We hate the idea that the universe could present something our lofty sentience could not control, we despise her secrets and her mysteries because they make us feel weak, small and powerless. They are anathema to the ego, laughter at our arrogance, vitriol to those proud inner voices to which we entrust our humanity. We hate the unknown – it is a glaring truism in everything we do, in everything we name. We masturbate ourselves over daring thoughts of some untouchable void, orgasm over the fantasy that there is something forbidden, something we cannot attain, some realm or world we cannot master – some escapist dimension on which we can dream in order to forget. But the foreplay does not last – and we **** ourselves.
We pour down tributes to our ignorance and enshrine our desperate fumbles as wisdom – congratulating ourselves that we managed to fit the word A-causal/Zen into our writing next to other words – to contain it, explain it, attain it – even if only to highlight it by virtue of what we didn’t say by surrounding it with causality as many times as we could. Then, we pat ourselves on the back and move on to imprison the next purity and sublime occult experience that dares to think itself above our causal verbal laws. Its what we’ve always done, its what we’ll always do.
Our reaction to the anti-concept of the A-causal provides deep and humiliating insight into the fragility and mentality of the collective human race and its paralyzing fear of the occult – of the hidden. Of a thing that dares remain truly hidden.
Reply With Quote
It is the tradition of people to rely on the intellect, on being able to understand rationally, to limit the unknown to the known and translate perception. It is commonplace to use our intellect to explain things to others or enable things to be explained to us which we do not understand – and naturalt to make the effort to explain things that cannot be explained. Explanation, however it plays out, is suitable/servicable for many things, for things in general – but it is not difficult to demonstrate the restraint built into language as a means to communicate, or show that it involves a prejudice of time and space used as the basis for its model of understanding. This model cannot be changed or evolved to explain certain things because of its inherent duality and the present lack of understanding of the power of a duality-driven mindset – moreover the model contains within itself by virtue of its duality a self-regulating gyroscope that causes language to perpetuate duality – and itself like an unchanging fractal that falls into itself forever.
This can be illustrated quite easily by the observation that the order of words has a direct result on the reader (who percieves) – and reacts. How you react is for all intents and purposes random – but that you react is not. We can see that Ideas, as communicated by others are perhaps never simply accepted as a pure communication that passes exactly what the writer had in mind onto paper or screen – they almost always generate conflict – as if the writer is unable to capture an objective statement of truth no matter what words they choose to use, how carefully they phrase them, or how ever many clauses and asterisks and footnotes they may include. Writing, tends to have an automatic effect of causing a reaction rather than a reflexion. Caution at this point is advised against imposing a moral conclusion over this fact – my concern is never whether this process is “good” or “bad” but simply to illustrate and prove the existence of the process. By reaction I mean an unconscious pull by the ego to respond to the stimulus received – however it chooses to interpret it, and by reflexion I mean a contemplative state of occult and self awareness that recognizes one has reactions but does not automatically obey them as prompted by the ego.
The point of A-causal to Zen is not to provide another phenomena on which to hang ones causal hat, nor provide another point in space to speculate intellectually – however causally titillating the temptation and rewarding/gratifying the poetic associations that flow in tribute – but represents a faint light in the distance of the logos that dawns from time to time in the face of contemplation. It is borne of the struggle to escape language, morality, duality, time and those dead weights we recycle in absurdio when faced with the prospect of something we are told we cannot know. It is the gnosis that jettisons causal spatial suppositions – spurns our doctrine of cartesian grid unconsciously imposed that orders phenomena to be ‘from’, ‘within’, ‘next to’, ‘outside’, ‘inside’, ‘beyond’ – simplifying the vast into the discrete using tensions that imply the existence of singular autonomous points. Unfortunately, in the desire to share, experience is written down, all too often profaning the mystery because of the means by which its message is carried.
The attempt to try to Know unhinges any knowing precisely because Words – those causal prisoners and jailers – are used to denote occulture. As soon as the word a-causal presents itself it undergoes a transformation, literal and literary. Its presence creates a shadow, an order, and is forcibly slotted into various heirarchies – pushed into and out of place by the law of words that draws some together and pushes other apart – an automatic dichotomy inherent in the supposed freedom of language to express. Viz. express freely – but within the limits of freedom.
In word or form the a-causal comes under verbal law. It becomes a ‘thing’ like all other mundane things, disposable, drained of wonder, drained of authenticity. As is the doctrine of verbal law, the word/sound/form once presenced causally is subject to the laws of form. Its name, used as a key to point toward a wordless door, a silent desert that rebukes understanding – is abused, misunderstood and sullied by clumsy attempts to extrapolate its purity with a barrage of associations and connective verbal tissues. It is thrown into the morass of language, sat next to words it has no sincere desire to be with, and forced to represent our will for it to be the occult secret itself. Causality supposes –this- and –that- to make separations where there are only prejudiced traditions of experiencing the world through the window of the human-centred ego. We cannot imagine what would be without our license to suppose, and it is ironic that our faith in knowledge prevents the evolution of it.
The word a-causal denotes an anti-concept, a sound for a vacuum of meaning outside the framework we conveniently apply. It does not denote a thing, a state, a term, word, or inference available to us through language – it is outside of language, indeed outside of languages ability to relate or even present – and that is precisely the words/sounds point – as a stop sign indicating the city limits of perception.
Like Zen before it, it is subjected to the same problems all words create – no matter what occult (hidden) wisdom they attempt to convey – once a word, immediately a form. Using a frame of reference built with instituted causal tools and prejudices people attach all manner of meaning and explaination to weigh down the sublime. To suppose nothing we must suppose something. How many ways have people tried to show Nothing. When it comes to the acausal people cannot leave well enough alone.
We build up a causal model of something we simply cannot fathom – precisely because we cannot fathom it. Precisely because we have a word like fathom and hate to waste it! We hate the idea that the universe could present something our lofty sentience could not control, we despise her secrets and her mysteries because they make us feel weak, small and powerless. They are anathema to the ego, laughter at our arrogance, vitriol to those proud inner voices to which we entrust our humanity. We hate the unknown – it is a glaring truism in everything we do, in everything we name. We masturbate ourselves over daring thoughts of some untouchable void, orgasm over the fantasy that there is something forbidden, something we cannot attain, some realm or world we cannot master – some escapist dimension on which we can dream in order to forget. But the foreplay does not last – and we **** ourselves.
We pour down tributes to our ignorance and enshrine our desperate fumbles as wisdom – congratulating ourselves that we managed to fit the word A-causal/Zen into our writing next to other words – to contain it, explain it, attain it – even if only to highlight it by virtue of what we didn’t say by surrounding it with causality as many times as we could. Then, we pat ourselves on the back and move on to imprison the next purity and sublime occult experience that dares to think itself above our causal verbal laws. Its what we’ve always done, its what we’ll always do.
Our reaction to the anti-concept of the A-causal provides deep and humiliating insight into the fragility and mentality of the collective human race and its paralyzing fear of the occult – of the hidden. Of a thing that dares remain truly hidden.
Reply With Quote
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Sunday, April 10, 2011
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Boxguts AKA Doug Hoffman
One irrefutably creative mutha fucker over any beat or any canvas. Iller than ill.. Enjoy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
